In
Chiapas, southern state of Mexico, in the forest, the jungle, and
the mountains, the animals and the birds speak, rebellious rivers
stir things up, and the leaves concoct secrets with the wind. A story
began on the 1st of January 1994, when the Zapatista Army for National
Liberation (EZNL-Ejercito Zapatista de Liberacion Nacional) declared
war on the Mexican government to put an end to five hundred years
of injustice, exclusion, exploitation, and poverty for the indigenous
peoples of Chiapas. Their primary demands are “work, land, shelter,
food, health, education, independence, liberty, justice, and peace.”
Underneath
the ski mask, the uprising of faceless ones and voiceless ones took
place on the date when the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA)
came into force. After twelve days of armed conflict, the government
and the Zapatista Army declared a cease-fire, primarily under the
pressure of national and international civil society. During the same
year, dialogues with the government were begun.
In
1995, a commission that brings together legislators of all the parties
represented in Congress, the COCOPA (Comisión de Concordia
y Pacificación), was formed to move forward the negotiations.
These negotiations brought about the signing of the first part of
the San Andres Agreements that affect indigenous Rights and Culture
. The government boycotted the process of dialogue and presented its
own project for changes in the Constitution that did not respect the
COCOPA initiative, which was a fruit of the negotiations with the
Zapatistas. At the same time, the Ernesto Zedillo government increased
its low intensity war in Chiapas.
In
1997, more than 4,000 people were displaced in the northern zone of
Chiapas, with dozens of deaths and disappearances. In the south, forty-five
people were killed on December 22nd in Acteal** and more than 10,000
were displaced in the region. In 1998, large scale military and police
operations multiplied continuing the repression and violence against
the Zapatista autonomous municipalities.
In 1999, the EZLN carried out the national Consultation for the recognition
of the indigenous peoples and the end of the extermination war, organized
with the participation of the civil society.
2000
marked the end of the Mexican one-party State and the Institutional
revolutionary party (PRI) after seventy-one years in power. It was
replaced by the right-wing doctrines of Vicente Fox. The year after
the elections, the EZLN carried out the Color of the Earth March (Marcha
del Color de la Tierra) into downtown Mexico city, following the same
itinerary as Emiliano Zapata in 1914 during the Mexican Revolution.
Starting this same year, Fox affirmed that peace and tranquility in
Chiapas and with the Zapatistas has been achieved; he also unveiled
his plans for development with the Plan Puebla Panama (PPP).
In
January 2004, the Zapatistas celebrated their tenth year of resistance
and construction of a new world. In spite of the militarization and
the illegal war lead by the Mexican government, the Zapatista communities
survive on work and hope. The time for fear is over. “Voila
the awakening of rebel dignity,” they proclaimed!
A
Zapatista movement in movement
Here are a few lines in a humble attempt to bring out the distinctive
traits of Zapatism. These words are inspired from readings and meetings
that we have been engaged in and that brought us to note the movement
within the Zapatista movement.
First
of all, there are over a million indigenous people in Chiapas who
belong to nine different peoples. The majority are from the Mexican
Maya family: the Tzotzils, the Tzetzales, the Choles, the Tojolabales,
the Lacandones, the Mames, the Mochos, and the Kakchikeles. The Zoques
are parented by the Popolucas and Mixes. These peoples live primarily
in the Altos (mountains) and the selva (jungle). Of this number, more
than 200,000 natives support the EZLN in one way or another.
Since
the beginning of the uprising, the Zapatistas have woven a tight connection
with national and international civil societies. They have learned
to listen and to talk through their dialogue with the civil society
in order to know the many-stranded web of roads that can be taken
to move forward. For example, they knew, after twelve days of armed
fighting, to listen to the pressure of the civil society and have
become partisans of non-violence ever since.
Although
it is rooted in tradition, the movement has an opening on the world
that goes much farther than tolerance and well into an inviting openness.
The creation of five Caracoles, places for meeting and exchange with
the civil society since August 2003, is an example of the Zapatista’s
openness to the world. The Caracol, or snail shell, is the symbol
of the shell into which one blows and from which the sound travels
to call people together, as we were told in an assembly at San Antonio
Brillante.



While the Mexican government promotes the idea of a half-breed (and
uniform) country, the Zapatistas demand that the Mexican Constitution
admit that the country is made up of different peoples, who possess
a profound relationship with their history, their roots, the earth,
and their community. Each group within this multiplicity of peoples
must have its own form of social, political, and economic organization,
and it must be insured that these are valid and must be respected.
They demand the birth of “a new world in which many worlds can
fit - un mundo Nuevo donde muchos mundos quepan”.
In
the end, Zapatism furnishes a radical political force in the world.
This consists of a new kind of revolution. The Zapatistas do not want
to take power. Through action and speech, they show the world that
the emperor wears no clothes, which is to say, the mystifications
of the dominant capitalist system, of formal democracy and its institutions.
They have seen to the birth of an alternative path that dismantles
the dominant discourse. In their own organization, which is to say
in each village, each autonomous municipality, and each cooperative
society, decisions are made in assembly, and those who command obey
the decisions.
The economic alternative
In response to the Mexican government’s refusal to include all
the Indian communities in the nation, the Zapatistas continue to resist.
In this sense, they refuse the government’s aide and progress
with the civil society for the construction of their autonomy. This
autonomy develops through an economic alternative that permits survival
in the day-to-day, a life of dignity, and, in the end, the development
of independence through community projects.
Realizing
the importance of the creation and good development of the economic
alternative to allow for resistance, we wanted to see what the Zapatistas
had organized. We went to spend several days in the Autonomous Rebel
Municipality of San Juan Libertad, 45 minutes by colectivo from the
Caracol of Oventik, to the north of San Cristobal. Two articles that
came out of that exploration are, first, one on the coffee and honey
Cooperative society Mut-Vitz and, second, one about the craftswomen’s
Cooperative society of Xulum Chon.



* Thanks to Gustavo Esteva for his texts, his list of Internet links,
and his help in better understanding Zapatism.
¡Ya
Basta! Oficial website of the Ejército Zapatista de Liberación
Nacional (EZLN). http://www.ezln.org
FZLN
Official site of the Zapatista Front for National Liberation (FZLN).
http://www.fzln.org.mx
Rebeldía
Rebeldia magazine, published on-line by the FZLN.
http://www.revistarebeldia.org/main.html
Acción
Zapatista
http://studentorgs.utexas.edu/nave
Zapatista
Net of Autonomy and Liberation
www.actlab.utexas.edu/~zapatistas
Indymedia
Chiapas
http://chiapas.mediosindependientes.org
Zapatista
Index
http://flag.blackened.net/revolt/zapatista.html
Introduction
to México and the Zapatistas
http://flag.blackened.net/revolt/mexico/begindx
EZLN
Chiapas Battalion
www.geocities.com/ResearchTriangle/Lab/5225/bzalx/plalxbz.html
Enlace
civil
http://www.enlacecivil.org.mx/index.htm
Chiapas
Media Project
http://www.chiapasmediaproject.org